huh_ (guest)
New member
why did she quit mfc to move to lj? she was quite successful on mfc. if she was quitting camming id understand. but being successful on mfc and move to lj? thats crazy.
Brunette koooky with Tattoo, camming since 2010
- Thread starter huh_ (guest)
- Start date
- about model
She is a camgirl since 2010, and works under 9 different nicknames on 3 different camsites
Name Kooky Age 38 years old Country Romania Model page /models/9028
TheRock (guest)
New member
I think she made the right move. If you thought she was successful on MFC then on LJ she's a damn superstar, just try and get a private with her someday's, it's nigh on impossible.
Good luck to her, she is one of those model's that has a rare quality sexy as fuck and brain's to boot. MFC's loss is LJ's gain
Good luck to her, she is one of those model's that has a rare quality sexy as fuck and brain's to boot. MFC's loss is LJ's gain
Terry (guest)
New member
Props to her for sticking with her words. Unlike many girls who say "I am leaving MFC on..." and then don't leave or just return a couple of weeks later, this girl has promised to leave MFC on January 31 and she really left on that day and she has never came back.
L10K (guest)
New member
well I think she made more mfc then LJ but she has her own pornhub channel too showing free vids whats next? escorting
L10K (guest)
New member
I seen her few times LJ and no pvt like u said )))) anyway prefer mfc above LJ
Scam_Models
New member
She's only on chaturbate now with her last broadcast about a month ago. She does have a manyvids and onlyfans account, but I don't think she updates either one of those anymore. She broadcasts about 5-20 times, depending on traffic every 3-6 months. She does have an Instagram account that she updates fairly often though.
deb (guest)
New member
L10K you are a troll, aren't you? I can't reply seriously.
Scam_Models
New member
I would also like to point out that this young lady was the first to tip me off about the shit that goes on at Studio 20 in Romania. Thanks to her, things are improving for a lot of models that work for Studio 20. For those of you who may be wondering, it's not uncommon for studio owners / managers to "proposition" models. Andrew Tate is a very well known example of this disgusting behavior. There is another who goes by the name Marius who lost both of his studios in Timisoara thanks to myself and a few others.
Scam_Models said:
You got me curious. Tell more about Studio 20, please. I had privates with a few models from this studio. Although they all try the use slow/let's talk routine to keep me longer in private, most of them do what I want. Only a few find my requests too rude and then refuse to get naked. But I get a vibe from some girls there that they won't be ashamed of doing shady things to take all money from members.What is this "proposition" you are talking about? What happened to Timisoara studios? You managed to shut them down? How? Why?
Scam_Models
New member
So, I know about a dozen or so Romanian models. Some very well, others just acquaintances, Kooky being one that I spoked to at great length about many things. She was the first to tell me about her studio owner / manager "propositioning" her, which basically equated to, fuck me, suck me or you don't get paid your wages. Which is basically extortion and all that, kind of like the shit Andrew Tate is being charged with. The reason a lot of the studio managers / owners get away with it is because a lot of Romanian models are in fact married or have relationships or family that they don't want to know about what they do, which is why they don't work from home. Thus, studio managers / owners have this power over them of blackmailing them and since Romania is a shit country with clueless law and judicial system, a lot of them get away with it, unless you're high profile like Andrew Tate. I can't speak for every studio, but Studio 20 was notorious for this kind of shit.hakkmj said:
As for Timisoara, that involves another model who once went by the name IvonnaReeve and while it wasn't extortion for sexual favors, they were just not paying her, which forced her to keep working because they said she wouldn't get that money until she completed her last period and then when she did, they still didn't pay her, all because she was leaving the studio. Since I was very good friends with her, I convinced her and a majority of the models to just up and leave both studios that this dipshit owned and they all moved to another studio, thus forcing dipshit to lose both his studios in Timisoara. It was a very big problem 2-3 years ago and some of these issues still linger today.
As for the models themselves, yes, studios are notorious for teaching models how to manipulate members in order to squeeze every token / credit out of them. You will find models that work from home on their own or models that are successful are less of an issue. It's the new models or the models that aren't very good that use these tactics.
Thanks for your explanation.I've known a couple of studios from "inside" but I guess the ones I know were ok studios. Owners were pushy to make girls bring more money, making them follow schedules, create internal competition between girls and all, but none of them would do blackmail models. They would be a pain in the ass if the model was too lazy. But they would let the girl go if she didn't want to work anymore.One of the studios would have people watching the privates to direct the girls on how to manipulate members, but also to make sure that the models wouldn't break any rules or try to pass/take personal information. I never really liked the idea of someone else reading my chat or watching my cam. Even though the people watching were women and former camgirls.I don't know the name, but there is a studio, maybe more than one, that pays for breast implants and then the girl needs to work for them until the implants are paid. Not that many girls like to talk about this. All that I know is from girls from other studios that know the stories and are not afraid to talk. Every time I ask about it to a girl from this studio, she shuts down the conversation. They get suspicious first wondering why I want to know about it, and then a bit afraid to talk. In the end, they never reveal anything. All that I get is "yeah, there are some girls who do this, I don't know how it works", while sitting there with big fake tits that they got 2 months after start camming.Good on that Timisoara situation to shut the guy down. The problem is that situation is not isolated.
Scam_Models
New member
I think Gloria Agency does the surgeries for starting models. I'm not sure if Charm Studio does, but they might also. One of my favorite cam model catastrophe as I like to call it, in reference to excessive surgeries, is the model SabrinaKrystal. In fact, I just posted about her a few discussions down. While this site tends to glorify models as all innocent and angelic, the truth of the matter is, the cam industry is a damn shit show of corruption, crime and scams.
Scam_Models
New member
Gloria Agency models that I know of include LanaRhodes, RavenLuna, Sandra, AnaisBella, KaterinaKovac, ZendayaHill and of course my favorite MelanieSanchez. Melanie is the only one I had personal contact with and she's an absolute sweetheart. I think she could be a top contender, but she only plans on working another year ( according to her ).
Melanie is very petite and while her boobs are smaller, she has the absolute most perfect body. Just toned enough to give each part of her body the definition needed to enjoy it all, but her best asset is indeed her ass. As far as tight fit asses goes, hers is by far #1 on LJ.
Melanie is very petite and while her boobs are smaller, she has the absolute most perfect body. Just toned enough to give each part of her body the definition needed to enjoy it all, but her best asset is indeed her ass. As far as tight fit asses goes, hers is by far #1 on LJ.
I heard about this thing with paid tits too. It is a studio where almost all girls have big fake tits. It is not Charm Studio because many of their models don't have fake tits. I don't know about Gloria Agency. I think it is the same studio as Emma. But I don't know the name.
Scam_Models
New member
Just found out an interesting thing about Kooky today. While I didn't know her back when she used to work on MFC, apparently she started broadcasting from her apartment balcony. Turns out, she had a neighbor that figured out she was a camgirl and so they would actually masturbate together from each other's balcony during her show. Eventually, she started giving him control of her lush so they could finish together.
I have several videos of these broadcasts and it's clear as day that she was in fact watching someone from her balcony during these shows. The fact her lush was being activated without tips was also a clear indication someone was controlling it. Not mention, she had some of her most intense squirting orgasms during these broadcasts. I guess the idea of your neighbor controlling your lush and stroking his cock while you do your camgirl thing was a huge turn on for her. Now that is a truly great exhibitionist.
It's unfortunate she no longer cams.
I have several videos of these broadcasts and it's clear as day that she was in fact watching someone from her balcony during these shows. The fact her lush was being activated without tips was also a clear indication someone was controlling it. Not mention, she had some of her most intense squirting orgasms during these broadcasts. I guess the idea of your neighbor controlling your lush and stroking his cock while you do your camgirl thing was a huge turn on for her. Now that is a truly great exhibitionist.
It's unfortunate she no longer cams.
NiceShepard
New member
This sounds exciting, like something from an erotica novel. But I couldn't find any snapshot of her doing these balcony shows. The most recent snaps are from 2024, and she appears inside her flat.
Scam_Models
New member
Actually, I double checked. It appears the videos aren't from MFC, but rather Chaturbate 2018 as LaddyK.NiceShepard said:
NiceShepard
New member
Yes, I see there some snaps of her by the window looking outdoors.Scam_Models said:
Scam_Models
New member
None of the snapshots on this site show her on the balcony. This is a screenshot of one of the videos I'm referring to.NiceShepard said:
Scam_Models
New member
I'm going to use Koooky as an example today for educational purposes since it seems there are still a lot of women ( cam models and porn stars ) out there who are confused about what the difference is between peeing and squirting. I understand this topic doesn't interest everyone and may even be disgusting to some, but a fetish is still a fetish. I'm just trying to help folks understand the difference because believe it or not, if you can give a woman a squirting orgasm, you've basically hooked her for life. She will never have an orgasm any better than that and women definitely love having a good orgasm.
With that out of the way, the difference is really simple. One is voluntary and the other is not. Squirting is the involuntary response to an orgasm so intense that they lose complete control and this can, but not always, result in a squirting orgasm. Now most women, will fight this mentally due to feeling embarrassed. This of course just ends up ruining the best orgasm of her life. So many women out there missing out because their mind is freaking out about what they are feeling.
Koooky here, was a cam model who never held back her orgasms. Ever. She loved having extremely strong orgasms. From her facial expressions to her squirting orgasm, you can rest assured she never held back or faked any of her orgasms. Can't say that about other cam models, but it is what it is. If you like paying for fake orgasms, that's entirely up to you. Going to post a couple photos from the video I was talking about, just to give folks an idea of what she was like as a cam model.
With that out of the way, the difference is really simple. One is voluntary and the other is not. Squirting is the involuntary response to an orgasm so intense that they lose complete control and this can, but not always, result in a squirting orgasm. Now most women, will fight this mentally due to feeling embarrassed. This of course just ends up ruining the best orgasm of her life. So many women out there missing out because their mind is freaking out about what they are feeling.
Koooky here, was a cam model who never held back her orgasms. Ever. She loved having extremely strong orgasms. From her facial expressions to her squirting orgasm, you can rest assured she never held back or faked any of her orgasms. Can't say that about other cam models, but it is what it is. If you like paying for fake orgasms, that's entirely up to you. Going to post a couple photos from the video I was talking about, just to give folks an idea of what she was like as a cam model.
Scam_Models
New member
I believe Cytherea was my first introduction to squirting and she was extremely gifted in that category. There are definitely a lot of pretenders / fake pornstars and cam models who try to convince their fans they are true squirters. Some folks believe it, some dont. As you said, a lot of the skeptics are quickly banned, because nothing is worse than a member revealing a scam.
NiceShepard
New member
I understand this topic doesn't interest everyoneAfter seeing for the first time a porn video of a woman squirting, I was completely crazy about that and tried to find as many squirting porn videos. That was before pornhub, and finding these videos wasn't easy. It was a nightmare to find specific videos online in the early 00s.When the squirting trend started on camsites, namely on MyFreeCams, I was naturally interested. But I soon lost interest. Every other girl and their microwave could squirt. Most of them would squirt easily on demand, just 1 minute rubbing/fucking pussy and they would squirt like a broken fire hydrant. So many fake squirters... Some girls would have a gallon of water sitting next to them so they could refill for the next squirting show. There is a girl who still pulls this trick, and also the trick to pump some clear liquid inside her pussy and expel it by banging her pussy with her fist. I can't remember her name now.I think I should mention the difference between female ejaculation and squirting. Two different types of liquid coming from two different parts of the woman's body through two different "holes".Female ejaculation is expulsion of fluid from Skene's gland, and it happens during or after orgasm.
Squirting is sudden expulsion of urine that comes from the bladder.Both are reactions to a woman being horny and having an orgasm. However, female ejaculation can't be easily faked like squirting. After all, squirting is the same as peeing. It can happen involuntarily like @Scam_Models said. But it can also be voluntary, like peeing.From what I see, Koooky was squirting. And she was using Lush for that. That stimulates the exact area that makes a woman squirt, not ejaculate. Her pulling out the Lush is a common reaction to imminent squirt. From all I can tell, looking at this picture, she was squirting for real.
Squirting is sudden expulsion of urine that comes from the bladder.Both are reactions to a woman being horny and having an orgasm. However, female ejaculation can't be easily faked like squirting. After all, squirting is the same as peeing. It can happen involuntarily like @Scam_Models said. But it can also be voluntary, like peeing.From what I see, Koooky was squirting. And she was using Lush for that. That stimulates the exact area that makes a woman squirt, not ejaculate. Her pulling out the Lush is a common reaction to imminent squirt. From all I can tell, looking at this picture, she was squirting for real.
Scam_Models
New member
This is what an actual squirting orgasm looks like. No fake crap. Just pure, extreme and uncontrollable female orgasm in all it's glory.
NiceShepard
New member
Now most women, will fight this mentally due to feeling embarrassed. I used to spend a lot of time on MyFreeCams around the 2010s. There was no embarrassment at all. I could find a handful of camgirls squirting at any time on the site. Some of them would run a squirting countdown every half hour. They did so because this type of show was in high demand, and these girls had no problem faking it (aka peeing) every half hour if it meant collecting $200 in tips.It was common for viewers to call out the trick, and they would get immediate bans. Girls would get more infuriated about people exposing the trick than for the fact that the trick was peeing. They wouldn't mind spending the whole day peeing in public chat for as long as people would pay them. But anyone trying to ruin the magic trick would get a ban.I knew a few girls who would refuse to squirt because they were afraid they wouldn't be able to squirt and would have to fake it, which they didn't want because they would have to lie to their fans. They chose to be real.Most of the girls who chose to keep it real are still camming, with the same loyal fans, mostly getting tips just for chatting. The fake squirters moved to different trends/fetishes when squirting got old, until they were no longer relevant. Most of them quit a long ago.
Scam_Models
New member
Hi Mate_
Perhaps you have a way of proving who you are? I'm sure if you are actually who you claim you are, we might have a viable discussion about what I've talked about.
Your account has existed on this site since February 18th, 2025. That means it's not an old account, which means you must have made it AFTER you stopped camming. Also, if I'm not mistaken, models can prove who they are to get notifications of anything posted about them, but maybe I'm wrong about that. In which case, I am doubting you are actually who you are claiming to be.
If you truly are Koooky, than sure, I would love to discuss everything I've posted thus far.
Perhaps you have a way of proving who you are? I'm sure if you are actually who you claim you are, we might have a viable discussion about what I've talked about.
Your account has existed on this site since February 18th, 2025. That means it's not an old account, which means you must have made it AFTER you stopped camming. Also, if I'm not mistaken, models can prove who they are to get notifications of anything posted about them, but maybe I'm wrong about that. In which case, I am doubting you are actually who you are claiming to be.
If you truly are Koooky, than sure, I would love to discuss everything I've posted thus far.
Scam_Models
New member
For starters, YOU are the one who said you worked for Studio 20. However, you've had a tendency of lying about all sorts of things in the past, so maybe you simply lied about which studio you worked for, in which case, that isn't my fault, now is it? The fact of the matter is, YOU said you worked for Studio 20 when you were on LiveJasmin and were propositioned by your manager(s), which is why you left.
As for the balcony discussion. I wasn't the one who claimed it, I was simply informed about it, hence why I started off by saying, "I just found out something interesting" about Koooky and I had to investigate it for myself to see if it could be true. If you watch the broadcasts from that week, it is quite obvious you are looking OFF camera. You aren't looking at your camera or your laptop. You were clearly looking OFF in a direction that would collaborate with the claim. Second, your lush was being controlled by someone. There were no tips, so again, that part of the claim also collaborates.
Sure, maybe you just happened to be looking off into the heavens during that entire week of broadcasts, who knows. After looking at the videos myself, I agreed that what was claimed had a high chance of accuracy. In any case, you were clearly looking at someone off camera because you looked in that direction multiple times during the sessions where your lush was being controlled. If there was truly no one visible to you, then I can't imagine what you were making eye contact with, not once, not twice, but a minimum of 3 separate broadcasts. All of them show you looking off camera, in the same direction while someone is controlling your lush. So yeah, we can chalk that up as highly speculative coincidence.
Your last complaint was simply about me quoting your name. Who else's name would I be using when discussing YOU.
Below is a simple diagram to explain the balcony discussion.
Keep in mind, a lot of models like to reverse image of their broadcasts. I'm not sure if you ever did, but if you did, than my above diagram would be backwards, not that that even matters.
As for the balcony discussion. I wasn't the one who claimed it, I was simply informed about it, hence why I started off by saying, "I just found out something interesting" about Koooky and I had to investigate it for myself to see if it could be true. If you watch the broadcasts from that week, it is quite obvious you are looking OFF camera. You aren't looking at your camera or your laptop. You were clearly looking OFF in a direction that would collaborate with the claim. Second, your lush was being controlled by someone. There were no tips, so again, that part of the claim also collaborates.
Sure, maybe you just happened to be looking off into the heavens during that entire week of broadcasts, who knows. After looking at the videos myself, I agreed that what was claimed had a high chance of accuracy. In any case, you were clearly looking at someone off camera because you looked in that direction multiple times during the sessions where your lush was being controlled. If there was truly no one visible to you, then I can't imagine what you were making eye contact with, not once, not twice, but a minimum of 3 separate broadcasts. All of them show you looking off camera, in the same direction while someone is controlling your lush. So yeah, we can chalk that up as highly speculative coincidence.
Your last complaint was simply about me quoting your name. Who else's name would I be using when discussing YOU.
Below is a simple diagram to explain the balcony discussion.
Keep in mind, a lot of models like to reverse image of their broadcasts. I'm not sure if you ever did, but if you did, than my above diagram would be backwards, not that that even matters.
Scam_Models
New member
Just a heads up, I have receipts for just about everything I discuss on this platform, especially if it involves financial transactions. There were no financial transactions between us. Everything I discussed here was either personal interaction online or in regards to the balcony discussion, I was informed about it and after investigating it myself, I deemed it credible. Honestly, if you really are Koooky, which I still doubt you are, I'm willing to bet the balcony discussion is in fact accurate. There's just way too much evidence.
EDIT: I take it back, there are actually 4 different video broadcasts that week from the balcony. In every single broadcast, your laptop and camera are straight in front of you. You can clearly see when you are looking at the camera or at the laptop. So if there is no one visible to you, than why are you constantly looking off in a direction not related to the camera or laptop? Not to mention, during none of these broadcasts can a tip be heard that would constitute someone paying for control of your toy. So now what? You're just feeling generous by letting some guy control your lush on 4 separate occasions for free? I've paid to control your lush before and I can assure you, it wasn't cheap, yet this guy controlled your lush 4 times for free? lol, ok.
As for your credibility. You once claimed you were a model. You didn't actually specify what type of model, but a model none the less. Yet for whatever reason, none of your photos you ever presented could be reverse engineered to direct towards any modeling agency. That doesn't mean you weren't a model, but than again people who post photos of themselves on Instagram also claim to be models.
Once upon a time, you also claimed you moved to Spain. Remember that? Yeah, that never happened, now did it? You're still in Romania and always have been. The only thing that has changed is you stopped camming.
You were also notorious for selling multiple versions of "first anal experience" videos, despite the fact you were doing anal shows on cam years prior to you making the "first time anal" videos.
I have a few more things I would be more than happy to point out, but that was never my intention with you. I never had any issues with you, so I'm not sure what you're having a temper tantrum for.
Do you know what the Streisand Effect is? If not, I highly suggest you find out before you decide whether or not you want to go down this rabbit hole.
EDIT: I take it back, there are actually 4 different video broadcasts that week from the balcony. In every single broadcast, your laptop and camera are straight in front of you. You can clearly see when you are looking at the camera or at the laptop. So if there is no one visible to you, than why are you constantly looking off in a direction not related to the camera or laptop? Not to mention, during none of these broadcasts can a tip be heard that would constitute someone paying for control of your toy. So now what? You're just feeling generous by letting some guy control your lush on 4 separate occasions for free? I've paid to control your lush before and I can assure you, it wasn't cheap, yet this guy controlled your lush 4 times for free? lol, ok.
As for your credibility. You once claimed you were a model. You didn't actually specify what type of model, but a model none the less. Yet for whatever reason, none of your photos you ever presented could be reverse engineered to direct towards any modeling agency. That doesn't mean you weren't a model, but than again people who post photos of themselves on Instagram also claim to be models.
Once upon a time, you also claimed you moved to Spain. Remember that? Yeah, that never happened, now did it? You're still in Romania and always have been. The only thing that has changed is you stopped camming.
You were also notorious for selling multiple versions of "first anal experience" videos, despite the fact you were doing anal shows on cam years prior to you making the "first time anal" videos.
I have a few more things I would be more than happy to point out, but that was never my intention with you. I never had any issues with you, so I'm not sure what you're having a temper tantrum for.
Do you know what the Streisand Effect is? If not, I highly suggest you find out before you decide whether or not you want to go down this rabbit hole.
Scam_Models
New member
To be honest, I cycle through usernames about once a month or sometimes once a week. I've deleted 3 different Casanova masks and 1 Eros mask on Live Jasmin in the past 2 years. However, the only username you would even know of mine would be through Chaturbate and during the months I was in your room, I maybe spent around $10,000 as I was only around for about 3-4 months. My question to you would be, why would knowing my username have any impact on you proving me right or wrong?Mate_ said:
Ok, so...
First, the most obvious. @Mate_ is currently not a verified model, and there is no pending verification. I can't attest that it is the real Koooky. But, using the logic, I would guess it is not Koooky, but a fan close to her.Let me provide some context.Back in 2019, there was a guest (non-registered user) who posted three comments under the name Raspberry. Two days later, a registered user (Mate_, who had joined MyCamgirl back in 2012 [sup](1)[/sup]) replied to the comments to "defend" Koooky. I put it in quotes because, in my opinion, Raspberry's first comments were not a full attack on Koooky. Let's say it was a soft/borderline attack.Mate_ replied to these comments with two other comments, and nothing more. Raspberry continued to post, and his comments started to get more aggressive, including unfounded accusations. At some point, Mate_ emailed me saying that he was acting on behalf of Koooky, and attached an invalid [sup](2)[/sup] model verification to prove it. According to him, Raspberry was a guy who had been harassing Koooky, and she wanted me to delete his comments. I proceeded with the deletion because Raspberry had started posting suspicious comments and using different names (5 names in total). At some point, the commenting section was just him insulting and accusing Koooky (and Romanian camgirls in general) of scamming, with his multiple aliases agreeing with him. In my experience, situations like this almost always indicate that the user is a hater/harasser, and the comments tend not to reflect reality. Therefore, I decided to delete the comments regardless of the validity of her model verification. Raspberry never contacted me to ask what happened, argue, or provide any evidence to support his comments. That usually means the user knows he's been caught, and the party is over.Fast forward to 2025 (6 years after Mate_'s first email, and 13 years after his account creation on MyCamgirl), he emailed me again. Now, the problem was @Scam_Models comments, specifically, the ones that he replied to. I don't see any problem with what Scam_Models said. He was not harassing, insulting, or accusing her of anything. If anything, he was praising her cam shows. Another user (@NiceShepard) even found the stories "exciting". And no, that is not Scam_Models with another account.I have decided not to bother replying to Mate_. I have been on this for too long, and I have dealt with fans before. In 99% of the cases, if I argue and explain my position in a reasonable fashion, I find myself in an endless argument, and ultimately, I am the one who will be attacked and harassed. So, I decided to move on and not touch the comments.The pictures Scam_Models posted are a different matter. I consider them in context with the discussion and falling into fair use. But I could remove them if that was a problem for Koooky. But her designated lawyer has never said anything about the pictures.
First, the most obvious. @Mate_ is currently not a verified model, and there is no pending verification. I can't attest that it is the real Koooky. But, using the logic, I would guess it is not Koooky, but a fan close to her.Let me provide some context.Back in 2019, there was a guest (non-registered user) who posted three comments under the name Raspberry. Two days later, a registered user (Mate_, who had joined MyCamgirl back in 2012 [sup](1)[/sup]) replied to the comments to "defend" Koooky. I put it in quotes because, in my opinion, Raspberry's first comments were not a full attack on Koooky. Let's say it was a soft/borderline attack.Mate_ replied to these comments with two other comments, and nothing more. Raspberry continued to post, and his comments started to get more aggressive, including unfounded accusations. At some point, Mate_ emailed me saying that he was acting on behalf of Koooky, and attached an invalid [sup](2)[/sup] model verification to prove it. According to him, Raspberry was a guy who had been harassing Koooky, and she wanted me to delete his comments. I proceeded with the deletion because Raspberry had started posting suspicious comments and using different names (5 names in total). At some point, the commenting section was just him insulting and accusing Koooky (and Romanian camgirls in general) of scamming, with his multiple aliases agreeing with him. In my experience, situations like this almost always indicate that the user is a hater/harasser, and the comments tend not to reflect reality. Therefore, I decided to delete the comments regardless of the validity of her model verification. Raspberry never contacted me to ask what happened, argue, or provide any evidence to support his comments. That usually means the user knows he's been caught, and the party is over.Fast forward to 2025 (6 years after Mate_'s first email, and 13 years after his account creation on MyCamgirl), he emailed me again. Now, the problem was @Scam_Models comments, specifically, the ones that he replied to. I don't see any problem with what Scam_Models said. He was not harassing, insulting, or accusing her of anything. If anything, he was praising her cam shows. Another user (@NiceShepard) even found the stories "exciting". And no, that is not Scam_Models with another account.I have decided not to bother replying to Mate_. I have been on this for too long, and I have dealt with fans before. In 99% of the cases, if I argue and explain my position in a reasonable fashion, I find myself in an endless argument, and ultimately, I am the one who will be attacked and harassed. So, I decided to move on and not touch the comments.The pictures Scam_Models posted are a different matter. I consider them in context with the discussion and falling into fair use. But I could remove them if that was a problem for Koooky. But her designated lawyer has never said anything about the pictures.
- (1) A user can join MyCamgirl without joining the forum. However, when the user decides to sign in on the forum, a forum account will be created. The date Scam_Models mentioned (February 18th, 2025) is Mate_'s forum account. That was the day he signed in on the forum for the first time. Mate_'s account on MyCamgirl was actually created on March 2, 2012.
- (2) I considered Koooky's verification invalid because it was a low-quality picture of Koooky in a dark room holding a sign that says only MyCamgirl. I had verifications sent to me like this before. In most cases, a person instructed the camgirl to take the picture without explaining the reason why. Hence the sign saying just "MyCamgirl", because if the girl had to write the full sentence ("I am MODEL NAME and I want to confirm my email to MyCamgirl.net") she would ask questions. I am not saying this is what happened with Koooky. But I tend not to trust a verification like that.
In Koooky's case, I always found it strange that someone had to handle that for her. It is a simple procedure. Just an email message with the request and model verification attached. No documents or personal information. It is simpler than joining a camsite. There is no reason for one of her members to handle it for her. But I have met guys who insist on being a helper and do that for the girl. They are also the ones who actively search for "problematic" posts on the Internet to be deleted, while the girl usually doesn't think it is that important.
You are right about the verification. But there is no notification system. I link the model account to all pages related to her so she can have some control (geoblocking, hide country/age info, delete snapshots...). But they don't get notifications when someone posts something about them. The only notification they can get is if they subscribe to the discussion about them. But for that, they don't need to get a verified account.Scam_Models said:
Your account has existed on this site since February 18th, 2025.His account was actually created in 2012. It is explained above.
Scam_Models
New member
Well, thank you for taking the time to inform me of the situation. If Mate_ ever decides to request his comments be deleted, then I would like my replies AFTER those comments be deleted as well as that is information I never intended to divulge. I was simply stating things in my defense to prove I'm not just making shit up.